Environmental performance

Environmental performance of buildings

COIMA RES’ investment decisions prioritise properties that are able to immediately achieve high energy and environmental performance thanks to its design and implementation characteristics, or subsequently through targeted renovations, also proven by obtaining certifications based on internationally recognised standards, primarily the LEED certification. Since the due diligence phase, the sustainability characteristics, including any opportunities for enhancement, are evaluated through the application of the “Sustainability Acquisition Checklist” and the COIMA Charter (an ESG evaluation system of investments which evaluates the possible areas of improvement by defining a numerical rating of the starting condition “as-is” and the objective scenario “target”).

To date, about 66% of the property portfolio gross value consist of newly built or recently renovated buildings and certified according to the various levels provided for by the LEED protocol. This percentage includes the Corso Como Place project which, despite the complexity related to managing construction sites during the pandemic, was completed "on time" and "on budget" at the end of 2020. A further 24% of the portfolio value will be certified for redevelopment works to be carried out in the coming years.

The remaining 10% is made up of properties that do not have the characteristics to obtain this type of certification (bank branches).

The achievement of high energy and environmental performance allows the combination of economic objectives through the reduction of energy costs and other operating costs, and to extend the average life of the plants, reducing their wear and tear over time. During 2020, priority was given to building system commissioning and to raising the awareness of tenants on the operating parameters of the buildings in order to ensure the reduction of consumption according to the effective presence of people in the offices and the effective use of spaces.

20% of the portfolio’s carbon emissions are landlordrelated (Scope 1 and 2), while the remaining 80% are under the control of the tenants (Scope 3), and on this portion COIMA RES has limited direct ability to intervene. The implementation of a plan to reduce consumption and therefore greenhouse gas emissions must include a strong involvement of the tenants, an aspect on which COIMA RES has already started to focus on. In particular, the sharing of energy consumption data between tenants and COIMA RES is an essential first step to obtain an accurate overview of the energy consumption of the portfolio. COIMA RES has already achieved an excellent degree of collaboration with its tenants, represented by the limited portion of data estimation (equal to 11% data estimated by COIMA RES).

Energy consumption decreased significantly compared to 2019 data, with a portfolio effect of 21% having a 19% effect on CO2 emissions, almost exclusively due to reduced office presence between February and June 2020 when the COVID-19 healthcare emergency was more severe. The return of staff to the offices, even partial, brought the plants back to operation during the summer months until the second period of healthcare emergency that began in November 2020. During 2020, detailed analyses were carried out on the particularly energy-intensive properties.

During 2021, a portfolio decarbonisation plan will be conducted to evaluate the interventions to be carried out on buildings in the coming years.

Appendix - epra tables

Environmental performance of coima res' portfolio

INDICATORS Total electricity consumption Elec - Abs Elec - LFL DH&C-Abs DH&C-LFL Fuels-Abs Fuels-LFL Energy- Int GHG-Dir-Abs GHG-Indir-Abs GHG-Indir-Abs GHG-Int Water-Abs Waste-Abs Waste-LFL Cert-Tot Water-LFL Water-Int1 Annual MWh - tenant Annual MWh - landlord Annual MWh - total % from renewable source Annual MWh - tenant Annual MWh - landlord Annual MWh - total Annual MWh MWh Annual MWh Annual MWh KWh/m tCO e tons tons % recycled % recycled % of sqm of portfolio tCO e tCO e/m m m m /m tCO e (location based) % from renewable sources % from renewable sources 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 Total electability consumption: Like-for-like Total energy consumption from district heating and cooling1 Like for like consumption from district heating and cooling Total energy consumption from fuel Total fuel energy consumption: Like-for-like Energy intensity of buildings Direct greenhouse gas emissions (total) Scope 1 Indirect greenhouse gas emissions (total) Scope 2 Indirect greenhouse gas emissions (total) Scope 3 Total water consumption Intensity of greenhouse gas emissiosn of the buildings Like-for-like water consumption Building water consumption intensity Weight of waste by disposal route (total) Weight of waste by disposal route (Like-for-like) Type and number of assets certifies EPRA UNIT OF MEASURE Notes:Coverage:Estimates made:Estimation criteria: n.a.1. 2. 3. The reporting perimeter as of December 31st, 2020 and Like-for-Like 2019-2020 is specified in the methodological note. In both cases, the reference perimeter of each property and its data were reweighted according to the relative percentages of ownership. It should also be noted that the Like-for-Like perimeter does not consider the occupancy rate of buildings, while taking into account any changes in the percentage of property ownership.Consumption data (except waste) have been provided by the respective Property Managers and include data for which they directly purchase electricity and natural gas or water management. In addition, the consumption of electricity for which the tenants are directly responsible is also accountable. The reference area of consumption is considered gross, i.e. including common spaces and parking lots, as COIMA RES is responsible for consumption in these areas.The 2019 data has been integrated with respect to the Annual Report 2019 with the additional information made available after publication. Compared to previous reports, greenhouse gas emissions have also been reclassified for Scope 1, 2 and 3 as detailed below. Emissions related to Scope 1 are direct emissions generated by fossil fuel related to Landlord area; emissions related to Scope 2 are the indirect emissions generated by electricity consumption of the Landlord; emissions related to Scope 3 are the emissions generated by tenant consumption and related to every kind of energy source. the level of coverage (expressed as a percentage) is given by the ratio of square meters covered by the indicator to the total square meters owned by the portfolio. In particular, with regard to the coverage represented compared to Offices, Retail and Other, this is calculated with respect to the corresponding square meters of the different type of asset considered. The information related to the certification of the properties has been calculated compared to the total square meters of the properties in the portfolio as of December 31st, 2020. Estimates had to be made for information on the waste produced. In addition, the electricity consumption related to some tenants for Gioiaotto, Corso Como Place, Sarca, a few months of Vodafone complex and Tocqueville has been estimated as well. The photovoltaic production of Gioiaotto and Pavilion has been estimated. The month of December 2020 for Monte Rosa has been estimated for gas. Drinking water has been estimated for the Vodafone complex, Gioiaotto and the month of December 2020 for Sarca and Deruta. Electrical consumption due to groundwater pumping serving Pavilion is considered as Landlord consumption. The percentage of renewable energy consists of the share of electricity coming from supply contracts with guarantee of origin (GO certifications) divided by the total consumption of electricity; in case of GO certificates, electricity is considered 100% renewable, otherwise 0%. As far as data estimation is concerned, the calculation was based on a series of assumptions. If data for 1-2 months (Nov-Dec 2020) are missing, they are estimated to be the same as the last available month; if there are 3 months or more left, the average monthly consumption extends to the missing months; if the entire year of the tenant is missing, but you have the historical data, the data of the known year (previous year) is taken, and if possible it is disproportionate according to the multi-year trend of consumption of known tenants. Finally, in the case of multitenant buildings, in case the tenant data is completely unknown, the weighted average of kWh/sqm of the known tenant data (tenant consumption sum/tenant sqm sum) is calculated: this coefficient is then multiplied by the square meters of the tenant being estimated. = not applicable Energy intensity, carbon intensity and water intensity were calculated using impact data (energy consumption, total emissions and water consumption) as a numerator and the area of the relative property square meters as the denominator. The efficiency indicators were separately calculated by type of building (offices, retail and more) and also for the entire portfolio. CO2 conversion factors shall be taken respectively from the “Ministerial Table of National Standard Parameters for the Monitoring and Reporting of Greenhouse Gases” (Update 2019) with regard to Scope I emissions, and from the table “Production emission factors and consumption elettricità_2020” published by ISPRA with regard to Scope II emissions. COIMA RES does not monitor the delivery of waste, the disposal of which is managed directly by the reference municipalities. The average coefficients (kc and kd) made available by the Municipalities of Rome and Milan and the respective average percentages of separate collection obtained from the ISPRA waste land registry were used for the calculation. 3% 7% 11% 11% 7% 7% 4% 27% 12% 23% 100% 100% -3% 13% ESTIMATE n.d. n.d. 402 n.d. n.d. 402 n.a. 100% n.a. n.a. n.a. 33.29 n.a. 128 n.a. 0.011 7,866 7,866 0.65 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 84% n.a. 71% 0.015 6,821 6,821 0.92 0 41 0 138 n.a. 0 100% 100% 100% 91% 100% 91% n.a. 0% 0% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 100% 100% 71% 123 100% 100% 95% 251 374 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% n.a. 100% 71% 71% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 100% 100% 71% 91% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 91% 123 251 374 0% 2017 2018 COVERAGE COVERAGE 1,911 214 2,124 117 210 327 0 0 0 0 146 0 59 584 0.044 11,614 10,751 0.91 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.n. n.a. n.a. 88% n.a. 88% 0.03 13,213 8,732 1.11 473 123 0 49 417 240 100% n.a. 0% 100% 100% 88% 100% 100% 97% n.a. -16% n.a. -17% -29% 100% 0% 0% 0 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0% n.a. 0 23% 100% 100% -100% 100% 92% 1,423 93% 1119% - -100% 93% 335% - 1,423 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 78% 100% 100% 91% 78% 100% 100% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 100% 100% 100% 88% 100% 46% 100% -23% 14% -19% 23% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. -1% 100% 100% 100% 88% 18% 95% 88% -33% 94% 87% -26% 1,423 0 1,423 27% OTHER 2019 2020 CHANGE COVERAGE COVERAGE n.d. n.d. 15,014 n.d. n.d. 12,558 209 209 12,804 13,821 168.95 2,610 4,844 n.a. 0.045 62,202 62,202 0.37 1,537 1,012 949 1,273 53% 58% 59% 45% 52% 48% 0.065 55,614 44,754 0.37 12,481 244 3,923 6,934 n.a. 19,162 65% 100% 100% 95% 65% 93% n.a. 0% 0% 209 209 0 n.a. 100% 100% 100% 23% 11,451 100% 100% 89% 3,002 14,452 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% n.a. 100% 80% 65% 68% 77% 64% 64% 100% 100% 78% 95% 48% 50% 48% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 92% 18,107 3,809 21,917 3% 2017 2018 COVERAGE COVERAGE 17,239 4,312 21,550 10,983 2,591 13,574 6,138 6,138 6,568 5,109 230 211 1,197 5,938 0.049 125,128 110,526 0.96 1,405 1,425 1,091 960 62% 61% 60% 49% 59% 51% 0.040 96,765 73,327 0.75 3,216 182 213 978 4,775 6,081 89% -7% 0% 100% 51% 85% 100% 100% 93% -37% -21% 1% -18% -20% 61% 0% 0% 3,997 3,997 -35% -35% 0% 0% 0 55% 100% 100% -14% 100% 88% 9,781 64% -11% 100% -18% 65% -12% 2,113 11,894 100% 100% 100% 100% 56% 96% 100% 100% 99% 96% 96% 96% 71% 71% 52% 52% 100% 100% 93% 85% 96% 52% 96% -19% -23% -34% -23% 1% -1% 14% 0% -3% 100% 100% 90% 56% -13% 99% 89% -21% 98% 88% -23% 13,281 3,714 16,995 62% PORTFOLIO 2019 2020 CHANGE COVERAGE COVERAGE n.d. n.d. 5,045 n.d. n.d. 5,045 209 209 2,404 2,757 146 490 1,672 n.a. 0.041 9,715 9,715 0.18 156 80 67 156 51% 55% 58% 12% 51% 10% 0.037 2,866 1,364 0.12 1,888 139 551 992 n.a. 2,693 48% 100% 100% 99% 48% 99% n.a. 0% 0% 209 209 0 - 100% 100% 100% 11% 2,666 100% 100% 98% 50 2,716 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% n.a. 100% 45% 45% 22% 28% 22% 15% 100% 100% 45% 99% 25% 8% 25% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 99% 2,950 186 3,136 5% 2017 2018 COVERAGE COVERAGE 2,715 99 2,814 2,382 42 2,424 730 730 883 737 121 18 28 932 0.027 38,969 38,932 2.05 79 77 70 78 60% 59% 59% 6% 58% 9% 0.018 35,590 32,990 1.98 770 83 18 17 614 795 100% -10% 0% 100% 63% 69% 100% 100% 79% 4% -32% -2% -40% -34% 74% 0% 0% 305 305 -140% 66% 0% 0% 0 12% 100% 100% -14% 100% 96% 1,524 63% -36% 100% 90% 63% -34% 80 1,604 100% 100% 100% 100% 77% 90% 100% 100% 98% 90% 72% 72% 17% 18% 18% 18% 100% 100% 64% 69% 73% 64% 73% -32% -9% -15% -0.03% -3% -1% -11% 2% -27% 100% 100% 97% 4% 4% 96% 59% -35% 96% 59% -36% 1,737 85 1,823 16% RETAIL 2019 2020 CHANGE COVERAGE COVERAGE -6% 0% -55% -19% -81% -18% -15% n.a. n.a. n.a. -9% -19% -13% -18% -19% -36% -48% -37% 2% -1% 16% 0% -3% 6% 6% -17% -20% n.d. n.d. 9,567 n.d. n.d. 7,111 n.a. n.a. n.a. 10,400 11,064 235.4 2,120 3,044 n.a. 0.051 44,621 52,662 0.44 1,381 1,605 881 1,117 53% 58% 60% 53% 53% 64% 0.079 45,927 36,569 0.39 10,593 298 3,372 5,824 n.a. 16,470 76% 100% 100% 94% 76% 91% n.a. 0% 0% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 100% 100% 23% 8,662 100% 100% 83% 2,701 11,363 n.a. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% n.a. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 50% 55% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 90% 15,034 3,372 18,407 3% 2017 2018 COVERAGE COVERAGE 12,613 3,999 16,612 8,484 2,339 10,823 5,409 5,409 5,360 4,371 279 193 1,110 4,422 0.058 74,545 60,843 0.76 1,325 1,349 1,022 881 62% 61% 60% 59% 60% 61% 0.047 47,962 31,605 0.48 1,974 225 37 913 3,744 5,046 100% 100% 26% 98% 100% 100% 100% 57% 0% 0% 3,692 3,692 0% n.a. 67% 100% 100% 100% 82% 6,834 59% 100% 61% 2,033 8,867 100% 100% 100% 100% 51% 98% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 42% 100% 100% 100% 85% 71% 100% 100% 100% 100% 10,120 3,629 13,749 72% OFFICES 2019 2020 CHANGE COVERAGE COVERAGE

Performance Social & Governance

COIMA RES directly oversees with its organisation the areas of the business model in which value creation is hinged: financial management, investment, investor relationships, planning and management control. During 2020, the team employed by the Company remained substantially unchanged and was able to count on six professionals, all directly employed by the Company and possess the adequate skills and professionalism to fulfill this objective.

The fundamental competences in the Asset & Investment Management and Property & Development Management fields are instead outsourced, but always within the COIMA platform, through long-term contracts with COIMA SGR and COIMA Srl, which are aimed at ensuring attractive economic conditions to COIMA RES, as well as a shared approach to sustainability and high standards in terms of innovation and quality of service.

COIMA RES manages relationships with people to avoid any kind of discrimination and to protect privacy, health and safety. During the pandemic, people continued to operate remotely, but always trying to preserve the cohesion of the team and the quality of internal collaboration.

In 2020, the training and informative sector activities contained in the Knowledge Sharing Program initiative continued, albeit with less intensity, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

COIMA RES now has six employees with different roles and tasks. The wage differential is therefore not significant. COIMA RES has a direct responsibility for health and safety for office buildings (Microsoft, Sarca, Gioiaotto, Monte Rosa, Tocqueville and Corso Como Place Building B). Compared to these, an H&S evaluation was carried out by the H&S referent of COIMA RES. With regard to the other buildings in the portfolio, these are not considered within this reporting metric as the responsibility for health and safety lies entirely with the conductor. Non-conformities found during the H&D evaluation of buildings were considered unregulated. In relation to the mandate, note that the Board of Directors was elected in June 2020. The prerequisites that guided COIMA RES in the definition and consolidation of governance were: integrity and independence, transparency, compliance with the rules, corporate sustainability and control structure. For COIMA RES, it is essential to work with adequate governance to convey to the outside world a message of maximum transparency useful to obtain the total confidence of present and future shareholders. The members of the Management Board were selected on the basis of the following criteria: - majority of independents (7 out of 9) and only 1 executive; completeness and complementarity of professional skills, at least 40% of the positions reserved for the least represented gender. In addition, the Company has determined that the maximum number of director or mayoral positions in other listed companies may not exceed the threshold of 6. Therefore, it is understood that, also due to the commitment required, regarding the position of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, the same cannot be assumed by a person with the same position in another company listed on a regulated market.The Company has adopted a procedure (which is available to the public) to describe how to deal with any transactions with related parties. In particular, each Director communicates to the Company any role or interest he has in other activities. This information is public and reported in the corporate governance report, published annually on the COIMA RES website. As required by law, COIMA RES has established a Related Parties Committee (hereafter the “Committee”) composed exclusively of independent directors. The Committee issues a binding opinion to the Board of Directors in the event of transactions with related parties of major relevance. The Committee assesses coima res’ interest in completing the transaction, as well as the convenience and substantive correctness of the conditions applied. Notes: 1. 2. 3.4. 5. 6. APPENDIX - EPRA TABLES COIMA RES’ SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE Men - 80% Men - 80% Women - 20% Women - 20% 22% 22% n.a. n.a. 40 45 100% 100% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 100% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 0% 12,50% 0% n.a. 0% 1 1 7 7 1,8 y 1 3 4 (7) (5) (8) (6) 5 0 8 9 0 0 2 0 2017 2018 Gender diversity Diversity-Emp COIMA RES % of women in government bodies % of employees % Average hours % of employees Number Number No for hours worked No for hours worked Gg per employee Number % of assets in portfolio Total number % of assets Number of executive members Average term of office in years See note See note Independent / non-executive board members with environmental responsibilities Number of independent members % % COIMA RES COIMA RES COIMA RES COIMA RES Corporate operations Corporate operations Corporate operations Corporate operations Office portfolio Office portfolio Office portfolio Office portfolio Office portfolio Office portfolio Corporate operations Corporate operations Corporate operations Retail portfolio Retail portfolio Retail portfolio Diversity-Pay Emp-Training Emp-Dev, Y. Emp-Turnover H&S-Emp H&S-Asset H&S-Comp Comty-Eng Municipality Gov-Board Gov-Select, Alabama Gov-CoI, Alabama Wage differential Training and development Performance appraisals New recruits Turnover Frequency rate of accidents Average lost days Absenteeism Fatalities H&S Impact Assessments Number of irregularities Community involvement Composition of the Board Appointment and selection of the highest governing body Conflict of interest INDICATORS EPRA CODE SCOPE UNITS OF MEASUREMENT 1 2 3 Men - 70% Men - 67% Women - 30% Women - 33% 33% 44% n.a. n.a. 29 13 100% 100% 17% 17% 17% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Indicate average hours per employee 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 7 7 1 1 5 5 (5) (5) (6) (6) 0 0 5 6 1 0 1 1 2019 2020 COVER NOTES

COIMA RES Headquarter Performance

EPRA TABLE COIMA RES HEADQUARTER -25% n.a. -38% -25% -70% -70% 0% -25% n.a. 0%. 0% n.a. 0% CHANGE 2019 - 2020 0% -1% 8,402 n.a. 0 n.a. n.a. 0% 149 0 2.67 0.05 13.2 2.6 100% 65 0 3.77 0.02 66 13 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 11,921 n.a. 0 100% n.a. 0% 100% 100% 100% 2017 COVER 2018 COVER 1.42 53.8% 100% 2.47 60% 100% 7,593 n.a. 0 100% n.a. 0% 41 0 2.40 0.01 79 13.2 100% 31 0 1.49 0.01 24 4.0 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 5,675 n.a. 0 100% n.a. 0% 100% 100% 100% 2019 COVER 2020 COVER 2.47 62% 100% 2.47 61.3% 100% Consumption of energy from district hearting and cooling Totale energy consumption DH&C-Abs Elec-Abs kWh % from renewable sources % from renewable sources % from renewable sources tCO e tCO e (market based) tCO e/m m m /persons ton % recycled % of sqm of portfolio kWh kWh kWh/m Fuels-Abs Energy-Int GHG-Indir- Abs GHG-Dir-Abs GHG-Int Water-Abs Water-Int Waste-Abs Cert-Tot Total fuel consumption Energy intensity of buildings Indirect greenhouse gas emissions (total) Scope 2 Indirect greenhouse gas emissions (total) Scope 1 Intensity of greenhouse gas emissions of the buildings Total water consumption Building water consumption intensity Weight of waste by disposal route Type and number of certified properties INDICATORS ERPA UNITS OF MEASUREMENT 1 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2

Note:
1. I dati riferiti ai consumi energetici non includono i consumi relativi alle parti comuni dell’immobile.

2. I consumi idrici sono stati stimati ipotizzando un consumo medio di 60 litri /giorno per persona per 220 giorni lavorativi. Il numero di dipendenti è pari a 6 e nel 2020 è stata calcolata un’occupazione media annua del 30% causa Covid-19.

3. COIMA RES non monitora il conferimento dei rifiuti, il cui smaltimento viene gestito direttamente dal Comune di Milano Per il calcolo sono stati adoperati i coefficienti medi (kc e kd) messi a disposizione dal Comune e la percentuale media di raccolta differenziata.